Nick Assinder writes in his bit of the BBC website:
It is impossible to stand next to Tony Blair in a village in Sierra Leone, surrounded by some of the poorest and most traumatised children in the world, and argue that he is wrong to have come to Africa. And to suggest he is simply playing politics with these people is, frankly, insulting.
Only a fool would suggest the poverty, internal strife and economic problems of Africa can be solved overnight
If one thing has become clear during this whirlwind tour of west Africa it is that Tony Blair means what he says when he talks about the West’s moral duty to help this struggling continent.
It is also clear that the prime minister feels personally driven to use his position to do what he can.
Talking to him on the trip has only served to convince most of those travelling with him that he is absolutely sincere.
This is nothing to do with grand politics or sweeping gestures, it is about not standing by. And the prospect of failure is no excuse for not trying, he insists.
And it would also seem particularly odd if a leader of the Labour party, which prides itself on its internationalism, did not lift his eyes beyond purely domestic politics.
Don’t you love that one word, “frankly”? In any case, there are plenty of reasons to be troubled by Mr. Blair’s zeal for his Mission to Africa, and one place to start thinking about what these might be Raj Patel’s incendiary new article over at ZNet.
Nick wrote [11.2.2002]: Today’s Voice of the Turtle article on “What does NEPAD stand for?” got me thinking — surely we are meant to understand that this is a “kneepad”, and that therefore the scarred conscience of the world is located in its knees. Shades of playground frolics past…?