<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Differences between Philosophers</title>
	<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2008/01/30/on-the-differences-between-philosophers/</link>
	<description>Chris Brooke's Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Sjoerd</title>
		<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2008/01/30/on-the-differences-between-philosophers/#comment-159502</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualstoa.net/2008/01/30/on-the-differences-between-philosophers/#comment-159502</guid>
					<description>I remember reading somewhere (I think it was a profile of Williams in The Guardian when Truth and Truthfulness had just come out) that Iris Murdoch once suggested Williams write a play. It is tempting to go with the suggestion that his stylish emphasis on the particular had a great deal to do with his opposition to neat theories in moral philosophy. I agree with you, then, that this thought comes in somewhere, but I also think one should resist the notion that a refusal to be boring somehow equals a lack of philosophical commitment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember reading somewhere (I think it was a profile of Williams in The Guardian when Truth and Truthfulness had just come out) that Iris Murdoch once suggested Williams write a play. It is tempting to go with the suggestion that his stylish emphasis on the particular had a great deal to do with his opposition to neat theories in moral philosophy. I agree with you, then, that this thought comes in somewhere, but I also think one should resist the notion that a refusal to be boring somehow equals a lack of philosophical commitment.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jimmy Doyle</title>
		<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2008/01/30/on-the-differences-between-philosophers/#comment-158819</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualstoa.net/2008/01/30/on-the-differences-between-philosophers/#comment-158819</guid>
					<description>I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sjoerd</title>
		<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2008/01/30/on-the-differences-between-philosophers/#comment-158757</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualstoa.net/2008/01/30/on-the-differences-between-philosophers/#comment-158757</guid>
					<description>Who was it said being too clever by half is perhaps the ultimate English put-down? 

One reason Bernard Williams is not just another boring logic-chopper, surely, is his style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who was it said being too clever by half is perhaps the ultimate English put-down? </p>
<p>One reason Bernard Williams is not just another boring logic-chopper, surely, is his style.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jimmy Doyle</title>
		<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2008/01/30/on-the-differences-between-philosophers/#comment-158658</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 12:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualstoa.net/2008/01/30/on-the-differences-between-philosophers/#comment-158658</guid>
					<description>Rob: Right. There's a line somewhere in Ethics &#38; the Limits (I don't have it to hand) where he says something about how ethical principles (I think) should "hang together, like conspirators," and I was torn between admiration and a thought along the lines of "you just couldn't resist it, could you?" It's a bit like Kingsley Amis's complaint about his son's writing, that he could never just finish a chapter with "They finished their drinks and left."

I had thought you were standing up for his opposition to the 'neat formulations' (in another sense) of Kantianism, utilitarianism, materialism etc; this I acknowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob: Right. There&#8217;s a line somewhere in Ethics &amp; the Limits (I don&#8217;t have it to hand) where he says something about how ethical principles (I think) should &#8220;hang together, like conspirators,&#8221; and I was torn between admiration and a thought along the lines of &#8220;you just couldn&#8217;t resist it, could you?&#8221; It&#8217;s a bit like Kingsley Amis&#8217;s complaint about his son&#8217;s writing, that he could never just finish a chapter with &#8220;They finished their drinks and left.&#8221;</p>
<p>I had thought you were standing up for his opposition to the &#8216;neat formulations&#8217; (in another sense) of Kantianism, utilitarianism, materialism etc; this I acknowledge.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rob</title>
		<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2008/01/30/on-the-differences-between-philosophers/#comment-158208</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 23:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualstoa.net/2008/01/30/on-the-differences-between-philosophers/#comment-158208</guid>
					<description>Nah, I was agreeing. Williams was too addicted to the neat formulation. A lot of the time, if you couldn't put it pithily, he didn't bother saying it, which meant that he got some things wrong and didn't always fully explain what he meant when he seemed to be getting things right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, I was agreeing. Williams was too addicted to the neat formulation. A lot of the time, if you couldn&#8217;t put it pithily, he didn&#8217;t bother saying it, which meant that he got some things wrong and didn&#8217;t always fully explain what he meant when he seemed to be getting things right.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: cliche guevara</title>
		<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2008/01/30/on-the-differences-between-philosophers/#comment-157201</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 20:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualstoa.net/2008/01/30/on-the-differences-between-philosophers/#comment-157201</guid>
					<description>I don't understand what is going on, at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand what is going on, at all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Backword Dave</title>
		<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2008/01/30/on-the-differences-between-philosophers/#comment-155801</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualstoa.net/2008/01/30/on-the-differences-between-philosophers/#comment-155801</guid>
					<description>Feh! I know &lt;a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=7M-cmNdiFuI" rel="nofollow"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; has been on Crooked Timber, but that's a difference between philosophers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feh! I know <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=7M-cmNdiFuI" rel="nofollow">this</a> has been on Crooked Timber, but that&#8217;s a difference between philosophers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jimmy Doyle</title>
		<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2008/01/30/on-the-differences-between-philosophers/#comment-155551</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualstoa.net/2008/01/30/on-the-differences-between-philosophers/#comment-155551</guid>
					<description>Sorry; I meant stylistically neat or cleverly put; a lot of the formulations seem right or plausible. 

I guess I'm complaining that he wrote too well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry; I meant stylistically neat or cleverly put; a lot of the formulations seem right or plausible. </p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;m complaining that he wrote too well.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rob</title>
		<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2008/01/30/on-the-differences-between-philosophers/#comment-155532</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualstoa.net/2008/01/30/on-the-differences-between-philosophers/#comment-155532</guid>
					<description>Bernard, too addicted to neat formulations? Never.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bernard, too addicted to neat formulations? Never.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ejh</title>
		<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2008/01/30/on-the-differences-between-philosophers/#comment-155451</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualstoa.net/2008/01/30/on-the-differences-between-philosophers/#comment-155451</guid>
					<description>So does that mean that Taylor only scores 2/3?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So does that mean that Taylor only scores 2/3?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
