<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The October 2007 General Election?</title>
	<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2007/09/26/the-october-2007-general-election/</link>
	<description>Chris Brooke's Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Michael</title>
		<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2007/09/26/the-october-2007-general-election/#comment-116940</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualstoa.net/2007/09/26/the-october-2007-general-election/#comment-116940</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;I can’t even get away with saying that I mistook it for the 80th anniversary of Prokofiev’s Cantata for the Anniversary of the Revolution, as that was for the 20th anniversary, and will therefore only be 70 years old…&lt;/i&gt;

On the other hand, Eisenstein's &lt;i&gt;October&lt;/i&gt; is 80 - which means that just about every documentary about the revolution will illustrate it with 80-year-old footage, in the absence of authentic 90-year-old footage of the real thing.  So it's a perfectly understandable mistake, if mistake it be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I can’t even get away with saying that I mistook it for the 80th anniversary of Prokofiev’s Cantata for the Anniversary of the Revolution, as that was for the 20th anniversary, and will therefore only be 70 years old…</i></p>
<p>On the other hand, Eisenstein&#8217;s <i>October</i> is 80 - which means that just about every documentary about the revolution will illustrate it with 80-year-old footage, in the absence of authentic 90-year-old footage of the real thing.  So it&#8217;s a perfectly understandable mistake, if mistake it be.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: chris y</title>
		<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2007/09/26/the-october-2007-general-election/#comment-116810</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualstoa.net/2007/09/26/the-october-2007-general-election/#comment-116810</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;You pays your money and you takes your choice.&lt;/i&gt;

I choose Balaclava then. At least part of one side was using the Gregorian Calendar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You pays your money and you takes your choice.</i></p>
<p>I choose Balaclava then. At least part of one side was using the Gregorian Calendar.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gobannian</title>
		<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2007/09/26/the-october-2007-general-election/#comment-116747</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualstoa.net/2007/09/26/the-october-2007-general-election/#comment-116747</guid>
					<description>I always thought it was in honour of Abergavenny Thursdays, the world fampus football team. But maybe not. While I'm here, can I recommend a very full and honest account of what is going on in Baghdad as a result of the invasion.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/20047.html

For some obscure reason, the Washington Bureau of a set of very obscure newspapers has been head and shoulders above the rest of the US media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought it was in honour of Abergavenny Thursdays, the world fampus football team. But maybe not. While I&#8217;m here, can I recommend a very full and honest account of what is going on in Baghdad as a result of the invasion.</p>
<p><a href='http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/20047.html' rel='nofollow'>http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/20047.html</a></p>
<p>For some obscure reason, the Washington Bureau of a set of very obscure newspapers has been head and shoulders above the rest of the US media.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris Brooke</title>
		<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2007/09/26/the-october-2007-general-election/#comment-116625</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualstoa.net/2007/09/26/the-october-2007-general-election/#comment-116625</guid>
					<description>Yes. 

I can't even get away with saying that I mistook it for the 80th anniversary of Prokofiev's Cantata for the Anniversary of the Revolution, as that was for the 20th anniversary, and will therefore only be 70 years old...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t even get away with saying that I mistook it for the 80th anniversary of Prokofiev&#8217;s Cantata for the Anniversary of the Revolution, as that was for the 20th anniversary, and will therefore only be 70 years old&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ejh</title>
		<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2007/09/26/the-october-2007-general-election/#comment-116619</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualstoa.net/2007/09/26/the-october-2007-general-election/#comment-116619</guid>
					<description>Ninetieth surely?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ninetieth surely?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris Brooke</title>
		<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2007/09/26/the-october-2007-general-election/#comment-116583</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualstoa.net/2007/09/26/the-october-2007-general-election/#comment-116583</guid>
					<description>I'd completely forgotten about Great October Socialist Revolution Day. Eightieth anniversary and all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d completely forgotten about Great October Socialist Revolution Day. Eightieth anniversary and all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cliche Guevara</title>
		<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2007/09/26/the-october-2007-general-election/#comment-116349</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualstoa.net/2007/09/26/the-october-2007-general-election/#comment-116349</guid>
					<description>Surely not an anti-clerical thing, because if people have all gone to Church in the morning, the priest will tell them how to vote that day. So that's the day of the week the Church would be most able to influence the state, so any gesture of Church-state separation would be a little counterproductive.

Surely it's just because nobody works on a Sunday (traditionally, and especially more so on the Continent), so it's seen as more democratic (for want of a better expression) as nobody will be unable to vote because they have to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely not an anti-clerical thing, because if people have all gone to Church in the morning, the priest will tell them how to vote that day. So that&#8217;s the day of the week the Church would be most able to influence the state, so any gesture of Church-state separation would be a little counterproductive.</p>
<p>Surely it&#8217;s just because nobody works on a Sunday (traditionally, and especially more so on the Continent), so it&#8217;s seen as more democratic (for want of a better expression) as nobody will be unable to vote because they have to work.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Caroline</title>
		<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2007/09/26/the-october-2007-general-election/#comment-116314</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualstoa.net/2007/09/26/the-october-2007-general-election/#comment-116314</guid>
					<description>25 October is also Great October Socialist Revolution day (at least it is if you're in Ethiopia or anywhere else still using the Julian calendar...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>25 October is also Great October Socialist Revolution day (at least it is if you&#8217;re in Ethiopia or anywhere else still using the Julian calendar&#8230;)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ejh</title>
		<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2007/09/26/the-october-2007-general-election/#comment-116267</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualstoa.net/2007/09/26/the-october-2007-general-election/#comment-116267</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;Yes, they do. Is it an anti-clericalism thing?&lt;/i&gt;

Dunno. Might be here in Spain I suppose, since the Church was never that keen on elections.

Possibly sort of anticlerical faux-ignorance: "what, Sunday is supposed to be some sort of religious festival? Stone me! What's all that about then?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Yes, they do. Is it an anti-clericalism thing?</i></p>
<p>Dunno. Might be here in Spain I suppose, since the Church was never that keen on elections.</p>
<p>Possibly sort of anticlerical faux-ignorance: &#8220;what, Sunday is supposed to be some sort of religious festival? Stone me! What&#8217;s all that about then?&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://virtualstoa.net/2007/09/26/the-october-2007-general-election/#comment-116255</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://virtualstoa.net/2007/09/26/the-october-2007-general-election/#comment-116255</guid>
					<description>Looking at the Times in 1935, the reason it was on a Thursday was because Parliament was dissolved on a Friday, and candidates could only be nominated after 10 days, so that made a Monday, and then the election had to be 10 days after than, which made a Thursday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the Times in 1935, the reason it was on a Thursday was because Parliament was dissolved on a Friday, and candidates could only be nominated after 10 days, so that made a Monday, and then the election had to be 10 days after than, which made a Thursday.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
