Archive for October, 2006
It seems to me to be only a short step from there to the necessary “Genius for Architecture and Mechanicks”, and then, I’m afraid, we will be finding it “hard to dispute with him the Dominion of the Continent”.
I don’t plan to get involved in this particular dispute. I intend to live in peace with the elephant, and as far as I’m concerned he (and she) can have the D of the C (though I’d still like to be able to visit France and Italy from time to time).
I was thinking earlier today about the politics of hair. As we know, “Let us trim our hair in accordance with Socialist lifestyle” is a recent slogan of the North Korean regime. Peter the Great campaigned against beards, while the Taliban mandated them. I’m told that the easiest way to tell a Partisan from a Chetnik in wartime Yugoslavia was by looking to see if he had a beard or not. Authoritarian institutions tend to like men to have short hair. Long-haired boys get special treatment in the Salic Law (“He who kills a long-haired boy, and it is proved against him, shall be liable to pay twenty-four thousand denarii”). There seems to be a politics of body-hair today in both gay and feminist circles these days, and so on, though I can’t say I know a great deal about where things stand these days. What other good examples have I missed, and how far back can we push the politics of hair? I probably should know about this, but I don’t think I do.
(And, dull academic bibliography question, has much been written about the politics of hair in the history of political thought, or not?)
(My goodness, a moment with Google reveals a Politics of Hair Carnival from earlier in the year, which seems to be largely about the hair of African-Americans. I’ll work my way through this as soon as I can.)
Seeing the title this post over at HM’s (it refers to the second clip) reminded me that I came across another passage the other day which can usefully join the set of beaver-blogging posts from this time last year which are assembled over here. It’s Anthony Ashley, Earl of Shaftesbury, reflecting on the animal kingdom, with a valuable reflection on the elephant as well as on the beaver:
Well it is perhaps for Mankind, that tho there are so many Animals who naturally herd for Companyâ€™s sake, and mutual Affection, there are so few who for Conveniency, and by Necessity are obligâ€™d to a strict Union, and kind of confederate State. The Creatures who, according to the OEconomy of their Kind, are obligâ€™d to make themselves Habitations of Defense against the Seasons and other Incidents; they who in some parts of the Year are deprivâ€™d of all Subsistence, and are therefore necessitated to accumulate in another, and to provide withal for the Safety of their collected Stores, are by their Nature indeed as strictly joinâ€™d, and with as proper Affections towards their Publick and Community, as the looser Kind, of a more easy Subsistence and Support, are united in what relates merely to their Offspring, and the Propagation of their Species. Of these thorowly associating and confederate-Animals, there are none I have ever heard of, who in Bulk or Strength exceed the BEAVER. The major part of these political Animals, and Creatures of a joint Stock, are as inconsiderable as the Race of ANTS or BEES. But had Nature assignâ€™d such an OEconomy as this to so puissant an Animal, for instance, as the ELEPHANT, and made him withal as prolifick as those smaller Creatures commonly are; it might have gone hard perhaps with Mankind: And a single Animal, who by his proper Might and Prowess has often decided the Fate of the greatest Battels which have been fought by Human Race, shouâ€™d he have grown up into a Society, with a Genius for Architecture and Mechanicks proportionable to what we observe in those smaller Creatures; we shouâ€™d, with all our invented Machines, have found it hard to dispute with him the Dominion of the Continent.
That’s from Shaftesbury, Characteristicks, vol.3 pp.134-5 of the Liberty ed.
David Runciman is very good, in the current LRB, on Blair, Brown, etc.
Pierre Henri Joseph Baume, an odd chap, born 1797, died 28 October 1875. The ODNB notes that, “During the course of the Owenite socialist agitation his distinctive appearance, considerable knowledge, ready speech, and ability to devise striking placards and proclamations made him a notable character. Many regarded him as dangerously mad, however.”
Oh, and a little later in the same article, “Abstemious in the extreme, he lived at one time chiefly upon dried peas, which he carried in his pocket, and at another time upon a mixture of garden snails and cabbage.”